06.26.09

Pop Shot: Astrea I vibrating brief

Astrea I vibrating briefThe Astrea I vibrating brief is “one size fits most,” which of course means “one size fits size small.” It cuts into my skin very efficiently.

Being from the Berman Center line, it comes with a tacky purple organza bag and batteries (2 AAAs for the vibrating piece and one 12V for the remote control). The remote is very inconspicuous: completely black with “C.E.N.I.” on it. A few tests confirm that the remote has great range (well over the 12 feet it promises), though I question why that even matters since the toy has only one speed/function/setting: on.

There’s a pouch in the underwear that I assume is meant for the vibrating part. Putting the 1″ x 2.5″ vibrating piece in there vibrates my perineum. My perineum, people! Which sounds a lot more pleasurable than it is.

Since the underwear is so damn tight, I can tuck the vibrating piece against my clit and it hangs out there. It’s fairly quiet and could definitely blend in at a bar or concert. I would not suggest tight pants, though. You may appear to have a tiny erect penis. I would not suggest walking, either. It’s too large to fit between my labia, so that’s… awkward.

Somehow, some way, this is priced at nearly $70. Need I say more?

VibratorsSex toys

If you liked this, you might also enjoy these posts:

  1. Review: Turn Me On Vibrating Panties
  2. Review: Cry Baby
  3. Pop Shot: Erotique Sheer Lace Gloves


Like

What's on your mind?

I welcome comments with open arms! To ensure your comment will be approved, take a gander at my commenting policy.

Want your comment to have a snazzy icon next to it? Get a Gravatar!

Tons of HTML tags are supported in comments.

16 responses so far to Pop Shot: Astrea I vibrating brief

  1. EliotNo Gravatar Says:

    I’m betting the range is for a lover to control the vibrating piece. The lover can turn it on or off and the panty wearer is at their mercy. At least, that’s what I’m assuming it’s for. *shrug*

    ReplyReply
  2. EpiphoraNo Gravatar Says:

    @Eliot: Well, yes, obviously. Otherwise it wouldn’t be remote controlled. But having just two options sounds like a pretty boring time to me.

    ReplyReply

  3. LillyNo Gravatar Says:

    Sounds like the Venus Penis 2 I reviewed ages ago, in that there was only one speed. And that speed was “whisper”, lol.

    I’m honestly appalled at the pricing. $70 and they can’t even make different sizes?!? If you stop and think for a minute here, I’d be generous and say that at MOST this sucker costs them $10 to make.

    It’s shit like this that makes me so glad I am a reviewer and no longer wasting my money (wow did I waste money in the past) but also, I feel this driving need to make sure that more buyers see our reviews. If you type in “sex toy reviews” in Google….Pleasurist’s site isn’t on the first page. One of the top results is even a company who’s reviews of the toys they sell are 90% positive, no matter how crappy the toy is.

    ReplyReply
  4. Don HoustonNo Gravatar Says:

    The Model I sounds like the Model II I reviewed (http://www.xcritic.com/review/34026/astrea-ii—vibrating-remote-thong/ ) with all the same limitations. Since it isn’t waterproof, the longevity of the vibrator is in question too.

    ReplyReply
  5. EpiphoraNo Gravatar Says:

    @Don Houston: I don’t think they’re even different models at all, just different styles of underwear. Good point about it not being waterproof, too. I didn’t think of that, in terms of female wetness.

    ReplyReply