When I write a negative review of a toy, I don’t expect to ever hear from the company that produced it — and I usually don’t. I’ll be the first to admit that my negative reviews can get very snarky, so I’m not shocked by this. But recently I wrote a review of the OhMiBod in which I called it a “shoddy piece of crap,” and to my great surprise, I received a very positive email response from the company. In the email, I was offered a chance to try a new wireless version of the OhMiBod. The email ended,
Thanks also for the critical review of our first one. We’ve fixed a couple of issues you talked about but people like you are why we keep developing and striving for perfection. So thanks! You are great for our industry. Best Brian & Suki.
I was floored. They seemed to be glad that I wrote such a scathing review. In subsequent emails, they asked if I would like to test some of their upcoming products and give them feedback. All of this changed my entire opinion about their company. Even if I hated the OhMiBod as a toy, there were good, appreciative people behind it — people who recognize the treasure trove that is a negative review.
Today, I have witnessed the flipside of the coin, in the form of a comment on my negative review of the Don Wands Treeze wood/urethane vibrator. The comment is from “Don,” who is apparently a representative from Don Wands, as he left the email address info@donwands.com (I also looked up the IP address. Perrysburg, Ohio: where Glow Industries, Inc. is based — which is the company in charge of Don Wands.). In just the few hours since receiving this comment and tweeting about it, I’ve also received a slew of new comments from my readers, many of them expressing distaste for the tone of Don’s comment.
I’m going to re-print his comment, paragraph by paragraph, and respond to it here. This is only fair, I think, since he chose to post his thoughts publicly rather than emailing me privately.
Well, it seems many of you don’t really know much about the Treeze from Don Wands do you? If you would like to find out more, contact the company, they can explain the difference of a solid wood product that is saturated with urethane resin so as not to need a coating, coatings can chip and scratch and create bacterial issues for the user.
You certainly have attitude right from the get-go, don’t you? How exactly did I misunderstand the material? As the packaging says, it is a “hybrid” of urethane and wood. I’ll agree with you that I should’ve emailed Don Wands directly to find out more about this material, but it seems that I understood it perfectly on my own: it is, as you say, wood “saturated with urethane.” In terms of coating, NobEssence uses a coating that is well-known for its durability and nonporousness, so please don’t try to convince me that any coating is a bad coating.
As far as the sound, we have included a super high powered vibe, because unlike you, our marketing research shows most women want power. They also want a vibe to last longer, since the design of a vibe does not allow for a very long life, we designed it to be replaceable for around $15.
Unlike me? First of all, I’m glad to see that your “marketing research” trumps my opinion as a female-bodied human. Second of all, did you ask your all-knowing women if they like the inside of the vagina to be assaulted with vibrations? Because that’s what it feels like. On my clit, however, I love power, so stop making assumptions. My main issue is this: if power means having an insanely noisy toy, no thanks. Lilly echoed this sentiment in her comment: “while I may fit into the women you designed this for (the Moar Power movement), the uggo design and power-tool-loudness completely kill that aspect of it.”
And finally, let me get this straight: you realized that women want their vibrators to last longer, and your solution to this was to make the vibrator replaceable? Don’t get me wrong — I think the idea of a replaceable vibrator is a good one. But shouldn’t your reasoning be “just in case the vibrator fails,” rather than “when the vibrator fails”?
The vibrating inside the wood sleeve, if not dampened, which they are now, will cause a rattle, so make sure you are tight before you get it on at your Grandmother’s house. If you want a quieter vibe, I will send you the quick fix.
I guess you didn’t bother to read my response to Lilly’s question about rattling just a couple comments above yours. I wrote, “It doesn’t sound like it rattles against the wood. It just sounds like it’s a very loud vibrator muffled by a sleeve. If you don’t screw it in completely, it will rattle.” As for your “quick fix,” I find it slightly laughable that instead of admitting that your product is too loud, you propose I alter it.
A solid wood dildo is only that, not knocking it, but these are two different animals. The solid wood dildos have all been coated to protect from the porous nature of wood, so you are feeling more of a foreign substance in their piece, than you are a Treeze. If you think it feels coated or like plastic, you have only talked yourself into it.
Yes, solid wooden dildos are coated (interesting how you now seem to be in favor of this type of coating), but you’re overlooking all of the reasons that your toy reminded me of plastic (like that it’s a vibrator and the colors look hokey and unnatural). Also, not sure why you feel the need to point out that “these are two different animals,” since my review centered around my personal opinion that a wooden vibrator just isn’t the same as a solid wooden toy.
But since you, disturbingly, have so little faith in the consumer that you would actually state that I have “talked [myself] into” feeling plastic, I must paste part of Backseat Boohoo’s response: “I was unaware that you were psychic and could tell how a toy felt to me. Surely I must be lying if I say this toy feels like plastic, for you have seen inside my head whilst I masturbated with said toy and have seen otherwise!”
This may not the be all end all, but with Don Wands designing and producing adult novelties with the customer and their pocket book in mind, it sure speaks to those who make expensive plastic and rubber throw-aways. If you want a good strong wooden vibe, we make one.
But I apparently don’t count as a customer? Your tone doesn’t seem to be keeping me in mind.
I’m getting the sense that you didn’t bother to read anything else on this blog. I am just as much against “rubber throw-aways” as you seem to be. And yes, your wooden vibrators fill a niche that has yet to be explored within the sex toy industry. I have to wonder, however, why you think a price tag of $70 is easy on the pocketbook. Nonetheless, you do not have to remind me that some of your toys are very reasonably priced. If you were to do so much as click the link to the “Don Wands” tag at the bottom of my review, you would have found my review of the Blue Tip Clear Rings glass dildo, which praises the affordability of Don Wands glass dildos.
Thanks for your honesty, but don’t be afraid to contact the manufacturer for clarification.
You seem to think that if I only knew more about this hybrid material, my review would be positive. Sorry — no matter what the material, the Treeze vibrator is still loud, has push-button controls, feels boring, and costs $70. But oh, I forgot… my opinion has no weight.
Toy shop Zotica Toys commented to me on Facebook, “It is funny to me that they think that they understand what women want and yet bitch about what women actually say about it.” I think that gets to the heart of why I feel slighted by Don’s comment — it implies that I am wrong because my experience with the toy does not line up with whoever Don Wands surveyed. Newsflash: women are different, which is why I have seen multiple very positive reviews of the Treeze line so far.
My review of the Treeze Wave, and my opinion of it, would have faded into the background if not for Don’s comment. In trying desperately to publicly defend a product that one reviewer found lackluster, he has only made his company look defensive and stubborn. As Carrie Ann put it in the comments section, “[Don] could have made a good impression for the company rather than coming across as combative and condescending. I think Don let his emotional reaction to a critical review lead his typing fingers into a response that was unprofessional and bordering on ridiculous.”
Don did not make an effort to respect my personal experience, and in doing so he painted an unflattering picture of his company which did not exist in my mind before today. And that company is now losing customers — six of my readers (and growing) will be avoiding Don Wands products now, and Zotica Toys is reconsidering whether or not to sell their toys in their online store. Especially considering new glass toy competition such as RubyGlass21, DreamToys and Erotica Glass, I would expect a company to be more careful in how they respond to criticism.
If you would have asked me yesterday whether I would recommend Don Wands toys, I would have said, “yes! Their glass toys are extremely affordable, and I’m in love with my Rainbow Mega Nubby.” Today, and from now on, I will say, “well, let me link you to something…”
If you liked this, you might also enjoy these posts:
June 26th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Very good post and rebuttal to Don’s comment. To me, his defensive response to your review came off as insecurity about the product. If you’re confident in your products, you will take negative reviews in stride and respond accordingly, if necessary. You don’t act like a child and risk damaging your company’s reputation which this representative has indeed done. Like CarrieAnn, I won’t discount an entire company based on this one incident, but I will bear it in mind should I ever have any correspondence with them in the future. And it certainly won’t deter me from writing a negative review of one of their products should that product deserve it.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:04 pm
Although this most recent comment is disheartening, your experience with the OhMiBod company is awesome! As a reviewer, I REALLY freaking appreciate it when a company listens to me.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
This is the sort of classic case study stuff they teach marketing and public relations students in school. Here is an example of how to do your job well and here is an example of how to suck at it.
The response you got from the OhMiBod people is a clear indication they know what they are doing. The truth is, as far as feedback goes, a positive review does very little to help a company improve. It’s nice, hell, it’s great to read or listen to how much someone loves what you do. But at the end of the day, when you need to figure out where to go next, you have no idea how to proceed. OhMiBod is clearly interested in knowing what their customers like and dislike and finding ways to fix what doesn’t work for the customer.
Don, on the other hand, reminds me of the manager in the restaurant where I was served raw green beans. I complained they were raw and he told me I was wrong, they were just cooked properly and I clearly had been eating overcooked beans before that day.
Um, yeah. Ok. Fuck you and your beans. Not only will I not be eating here, but I will probably talk for years about how you suck and recommend people NOT eat at your restaurant.
And at this point, I probably wouldn’t recommend a Don Wands product to anyone either. Not because they don’t have some good stuff, but just because now I have a negative impression of the company based on how that guy represented them.
Perception is reality man, if you don’t know that, you need a new job.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
Ah, poor Don is so misguided.
He could have apologized that you personally didn’t like the toy as much as he might have liked. He could have taken the time to explain (gently!) that while hand-crafted toys like Hans’ or Jilda’s are fabulous, the Treeze collection brings vibrating wood-based products to a much broader consumer base than Hans or Jilda ever could.
He could then have thanked you kindly for the feedback about volume and told you that he’d pass on that information to the design team. Heck he could have offered to send you the updated version as soon as it rolled off the assembly line!
Or (let’s get crazy here for a moment, shall we?) he could have given you and your readers a special discount code so that they could try out a Treeze toy and see for themselves. No doubt that would have gotten his company sales and positive publicity.
Maybe he’ll see all these followup comments and craft a more appropriate response?
June 26th, 2009 at 7:39 pm
While “Don” seems to represent Don Wands, I have to play devil’s advocate here and wonder if someone else made the comment with the intention of creating negative press for the Don Wands company. It’s easy enough to comment as someone other than yourself on a blog. Moving on, I can’t say that one comment on a negative review, albeit a condescending and somewhat cold comment, won’t drive me away from a company. The sales rep isn’t my favorite person now, and I’ll be wary of correspondence with the company. I think your response-post would be better if it focused the cross hairs on “Don” and not the company, at least without verification first.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:39 pm
@Laurel: Haha, oh, your beans story is perfect. Just perfect.
@aag: Exactly! A negative review presents so many options for redemption and newfound popularity, if you play it right. But if you act wounded? No redemption for you.
@Rockin’ With a Cock in: I don’t know why someone who isn’t from Don Wands would go out of their way to explain Don Wands products to me with subtle defensiveness. It’s possible, but the authority from which “Don” speaks leads me to believe that this is a person from Don Wands. As for directing my post, I directed the majority of it at this “Don.” But if he is from Don Wands, I feel entirely justified in transferring some of my feelings to the company itself.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:41 pm
“It is funny to me that they think that they understand what women want and yet bitch about what women actually say about it.”
^ This is EXACTLY what I had in mind when I read the original comment. I’m still appalled by the notion that a rep would post a comment like “Don’s” when most well-respected companies go out of their way to appreciate their customers’ opinions, negative or positive, and integrate them in to future products.
I love my Rainbow Mega Nubby, but there are other companies that create amazing, affordable glass toys, such as Phallix and ToyJoy. I think I’ll start switching my business over to them.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
@Rockin’ With a Cock in: I do agree that these annoying views may not represent the actual company, so I’m hoping the company will issue a statement ASAP and redeem themselves and/or explain the situation. Until then, they’re on my shitlist.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
I know many people are saying they’re not going to let one person change their view of an entire company, and they have a good point. BUT (there’s always a but) there are PLENTY of other manufacturers out there making quality glass pieces and I, for one, plan on taking my business to them.
I have sent an e-mail to Don Wands expressing my disappointment in this one person’s actions and expressing my hope that this situation is never repeated. I have PRAISED Don Wands in past reviews, and now will no longer publicize them on my blog. Like I said, there are better deserving companies out there that I would be much happier supporting.
I really do hope that “Don” learns to change his tone, and be more welcoming to critique in the future. It’s only a matter of time before other companies begin producing similar products, and Don Wands can only hide behind their “innovative” designs for so long.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
I’m surprised that he left such a comment. I’m impressed with how the other company (OhMiBod) responded, but his response was something else.
While I do think this line is pretty, it isn’t something I’ll be getting.
June 26th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
To those of you thinking this person may not be from Don Wands, I looked up the IP address. Perrysburg, Ohio: where Glow Industries, Inc. is based — which is the company in charge of Don Wands.
June 26th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
I find it to so hard to believe a representative of this company would be such an absolute asshole. Apparently, if this is the company’s stance, they don’t deserve our business- if this is an employee’s stance, they don’t deserve their job.
Wonderfully candid post.
June 26th, 2009 at 8:15 pm
Wow. It’s so sad it’s almost funny. I haven’t reviewed any sex toys yet, but I have reviewed a lot of books and it always amuses me when an author stops by to tell me I didn’t like her book because I just don’t get it. Not that there’s anything wrong with her writing, but that there’s something wrong with my comprehension, perception, or taste. So not classy. Too bad, ’cause I often buy products even though they’ve gotten negative reviews. Sometimes it’s a matter of taste and I like the product just fine. But when the manufacturer’s an asshat? Ummm, no. Sorry, an entire company just went on my Do Not Buy list. Keep up the great reviewing.
June 26th, 2009 at 8:19 pm
I’ve never bought any of their toys, and frankly now I dont think I ever will. If that’s seriously how the company treats the opinion of its consumers, then I want nothing to do with them. Looking forward for you investigation on this, I am really interested to see how this person justifies the way they reacted to your honest review.
June 26th, 2009 at 8:38 pm
Comments such as the ones Don left you, do honestly change my opinion of companies. I’m shocked that he went to such lengths to basically call you stupid. What an idiot. I’ve never purchesed anything from Don Wands before, but I doubt that I will now.
June 26th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Everything very well-put. Plus, I now have a newfound respect for Ohmibod (I disliked the toy immensely, and even though I’m fairly sure I’m not well-trafficked enough to deserve free toys and more opportunities to give input, it’s nice to know that they offered this to you).
Right now, I’m just sittin’ back and wondering if Don, or the company, will give a response. Because then I’d need to get out the popcorn.
June 26th, 2009 at 9:17 pm
If this is the personality that Don Wands wants to project, well, I don’t like their attitude! It is reasonable to assume that it could be the opinion of an employee, in which case I would hope to see a reply to you. My opinion of Don Wands has always been a good one until today and unfortunately for them, that opinion is now tarnished greatly!
Thanks for the honesty and keep us posted!
June 27th, 2009 at 1:05 am
it’s ridiculous that he would take so much offense to an opinion – its an opinion! Deal with it! In a perfect world, we, the sex toy reviewers would be able to explore every tiny aspect of a toy’s making, modeling and use before posting a review – and do this in a timely manner. But that’s ludicrous, and come on, why can’t a consumer make a public opinion based on the publicly available information? Lame.
June 27th, 2009 at 1:21 am
Right on Epi, they really need to learn to treat the consumer with respect. Now they will see what the power of the people, and twitter, can do. I will let my friends know about this and tell them not to buy thier products. DAMN THE MAN, SAVE THE SEXY TOYS!
June 27th, 2009 at 4:37 am
Personally, I would try emailing the links to both your posts here to as many email addresses at Don Wands as you can find. Perhaps the higher-ups are not aware of Don’s rogue mission to cut down all women with his swashbuckling sword of urethane.
I am, as others, REALLY impressed with the response you got from OhMiBod.
While I can agree that perhaps this all shouldn’t be enough to deter someone from doing business with the company at all, in my opinion – there’s other companies. Many many other companies who make glass dildos and someone soon will probably come out with a better vibrating wood dildo. Just because they are unique in making a vibrating wood dildo does not mean I’m going to try it. I’m a toy snob and if something looks ugly or hokey, I won’t want it. This also means I’ve been suckered into shoddy things because I had the “ooohhhhhhh preeeety” approach.
I’m also wondering how Don found your post. And if he’s on a mission to find reviews of their products, why didn’t he comment positively/negatively on anyone else’s?
June 27th, 2009 at 4:58 am
Epiphora and your readers,
Please accept my apologies for the poorly worded defense of our efforts to bring a new product to market for the consumer.
We are making attempts to correct all negative comments in the review, however the fever that has ensued over a few poorly worded sentences is a bit much. Please accept that nothing personal was meant by the comments and we accept responsibility for your feelings.
Thank you for the honesty in your comments, we hope you understand that we did not mean to come off condescending. We are here for your feedback and questions as you move forward on a review, we hope you choose to find out more about the product.
The market and our research actually have found much a different story than much of the comments posted as of recent, they are moving quite well. We do plan on improvements and fixes for those who find one that is too noisy.
With Respect,
Don
June 27th, 2009 at 5:37 am
Dear Don,
I don’t think anyone expects you to accept responsibility for our feelings. You can only accept responsibility for your words, which you clearly do not as is evidenced by your second paragraph.
Perhaps someone else should be the public voice of Don Wands?
June 27th, 2009 at 5:48 am
I do not reflect the opinions of the company or sales, I am the designer of the toy and am only interested in doing a better job of understanding how best to please as many women with one product as is possible
With my comments coming off in a manner that I assure you I did not intend, I do hope you understand that I am, in no way, wanting anyone to be offended or angered. Please accept my most sincere apology.
Regards
June 27th, 2009 at 7:49 am
I have posted my response to Don, as well as the e-mail I received from Don Wands, on my blog. It’s safe to say I’ll never get another Don Wands product again.
June 27th, 2009 at 8:43 am
Wow…that was so uncalled for. I’m sorry you got such a nasty response! This actually makes me not want to buy Don Wands products in the future. A comment riddled with tiny condescending insults? So unprofessional. Whether it’s a designer or the person in charge of the company, thats neither here nor there, it’s the tone of the comment and not accepting criticism to make changes to the product rather than belittle it’s users. Lame.
June 27th, 2009 at 9:07 am
You know there was a time no one would write a bad review. It’s new to this industry and new to many manufacturers (a lot of whom don’t play with toys).
I heard from a magazine editor of toys, that broke just by turning it on, that got the specs and image with where to buy in that magazine because, well they were advertisers and no one wanted to offend them.
In Australia this year Tantus’ CEO Michael, took a lighter to our silicone to show an audience of about 150 people what happened with real silicone (it singes from the lighter flame but you just wipe it off and that’s it) and then took two “silicone” products out of their packages (both labeled silicone) and lit them up burning the hair on his fingers when they went to flame.
Blogs are bringing some honest critique to manufacturers and to consumers- people might not like it but they better get used to it and I say- bring it on!
June 27th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Wow, what a mess this is turning into. Great response to the comment though. I don’t think you did anything wrong. You didn’t slam their company, you just talked negatively about a toy you didn’t care for. There’s no harm in that and it wouldn’t have been a big thing at all had someone from their company not responded so poorly to it and done it publicly.
I get that no company wants to have any product of theirs seen negatively. Not everyone is going to like it and people who still really wanted to try it probably would have if they didn’t have an issue with the things you stated. Others who never will see the review will still buy their toy. Causing a fuss over a negative review didn’t do anything but make things worse and lose them a few customers and a few more potential customers.
I hope this mess gets resolved and goes away for you soon doll. Xo
June 27th, 2009 at 1:30 pm
@Metis:
So cool to see a comment from Metis. Tantus is awesome.
June 27th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
@Don: I do not reflect the opinions of the company or sales, I am the designer of the toy and am only interested in doing a better job of understanding how best to please as many women with one product as is possible
By responding to Epiphora in the manner you did, along with the tones of your comments, you are representing the company, even if it is not officially. If you wish to better understand how to please as many women with your product, start by learning some public relations techniques.
June 27th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Maybe the real Don Wand should step up and issue an apology regarding their designer’s negative comments. As I stated in my response to Epiphora’s original review http://www.heyepiphora.com/2009/06/review-treeze-wave/ I stand behind Epiphora’s reviews and her right to post her opinions.
June 27th, 2009 at 2:17 pm
@Metis: You rule, Metis. And I so wish I could’ve seen your silicone-burning demonstration.
June 28th, 2009 at 8:33 pm
I just wanted to put in another good word for OhMiBod – we reviewed their club vibe and one of the samples was faulty (we get three reviewers to look at each toy) The OhMiBod people were really responsive to the issue and easy to work with. We’ve had similar good luck with Lelo.
OhMiBod review here http://carnalnation.com/content/8093/35/ohmibod-club-vibe
John
CarnalNation
June 29th, 2009 at 11:06 am
So pleased you had good feedback from OhMiBod. I recently interviewed the designer, Suki, and she seemed really switched on, smart and her response to you is exactly what I’d imagine her to do.
June 29th, 2009 at 11:25 am
I would like to take this opportunity to introduce myself: My name is Brian Nupp, I’m the Vice President of Sales here at Glow Industries, Inc. and we manufacture Don Wands and Treeze. I’ve been with Glow for 15 years and am very proud to have had a hand at our company’s success. We’ve come a long way! …but now I’ve just read this and feel our “cool” name is a bit tarnished.
Let me start by telling you that I am VERY SORRY for statements made by Don/Chuck (Don is Chuck our Marketing Manager). I feel his initial statement was callous and completely inappropriate and does not represent Don Wands or our company as a whole. I am completely embarrassed.
Epiphora, thank you so much for taking the time to review our Treeze! Without detailed critiques such as yours, we would not have any direction in which to improve. I think you have a fine blog here and you must, because you have quite a following!
The most noticeable complaint about the Treeze is the “loudness.” I’m happy to say that we’ve fixed this! What we did was slip a small high-tension band around the vibe itself. It does wonders to keep the Treeze quiet. A big difference! Epiphora, I’d be happen to send you one of these ‘new improved’ models. (And anyone reading this that has a noisy Treeze, I’d be happy to send you a complimentary rubber piece for your vibe.)
Price: They aren’t cheap! We made them as inexpensive as we could. There is a lot of cost in the material and work that goes into a Treeze. The wood/urethane shell is made in the good ol’ U.S. of A which certainly helps the quality control. There are several steps each Treeze goes through before completion, but I am not here to talk about the maunfacturing process. The price was a valid point and I thank you for addressing it.
Again, I am sincerely sorry for any comments made by Don/Chuck. I would like to officially say they do not represent Don Wands, Glow Industries, or Treeze. Appropriate action will be addressed with those who issued the comments. Please find it in your hearts to give us a second chance. We do appreciate any criticism, good or bad. We have improved some of our best sellers due to constructive criticism (see our Pink Bent Graduate Don Wand).
Most humbly,
Brian Nupp
Glow Industries, Inc.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
Now see, wasn’t that easy? Brian, that was a great response to the original review and to remarks made by Chuck.
July 31st, 2009 at 8:15 am
Honest bloggers such as yourself allow the customer a non-biased, up front, detailed over view of the product. It is nice to know that most manufacturers understand that reviewers such as yourself pinpoint design problems to allow the customer insight before they make a purchase. Thankfully in the end Brian Nupp stepped in to correct and retract comments made by Don/Chuck.
July 31st, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Brian,
I wasn’t going to comment here, and after reading “Don’s” response to the review and follow up comments I was prepared to think twice about buying any Don Wands product (which I thought was a shame because, while I haven’t bought one yet, I think your products look totally awesome- and they come with a storage bag which is amazing and ALL toy makers should do it- especially those who make GLASS toys- which are difficult to store without fear of damage, especially if you have more than one!).
Seeing your response here made me glad I bothered to read to the bottom of the page. You’ve restored my faith in your company and I would feel completely comfortable buying one of your products.
August 17th, 2009 at 1:18 am
I think Glow is misunderstanding the entire point of a product review. Its for feedback!!! That is exactly what you got. You every heard the phrase “Don’t shoot the messenger”? You made the toy! The only person you should be angry with is yourself. My guess is that you didn’t even bother to see how real women liked these before releasing them. Just come up with some generic shapes and put in your bulk overseas order and pop it on the shelf. I am sorry to tell you Glow, but you are the Walmart of sex toys.
If I sound annoyed, it is because I have had first hand interactions with their company and I know how they are. I will leave it at that.