02.07.09

Policing sex toy reviews?

So the Best Sex Toy Reviewers 2008 list came out. And I was ecstatic to find myself in spot #5. Although I’ve been reviewing since fall of 2007, I have only had this blog since fall of 2008, so I didn’t know how much of a chance I had. Being ranked at #5 really gave me a boost of excitement, and I want to extend a big thanks to Domina Doll and Scarlet Lotus for putting their time and energy into compiling the list. They even used my header to create a button for those on the list!

Since the list came out, however, several bloggers have written posts addressing what they see as an overabundance of sex toy reviews on sex blogs. I certainly respect individual opinions regarding this. However, Always Aroused girl’s post hit me the hardest, because it was written mostly in the first person plural (“we”). I greatly admire Always Aroused Girl for her dedication to the sex blogging community, but I felt pretty left out upon reading this:

. . . can we possibly all agree that the number of reviews we are currently publishing is excessive?  . . . I know that when I surf through blogs and find a front page which contains more reviews than other writing I lose interest fast.  I can only imagine that other sex bloggers think the same, and I have a bad feeling that readers who don’t blog are even more dismayed to find sexy writing playing second fiddle to toy reviews.

And this:

For those of us with the capability, perhaps a separate page dedicated to reviews could be created, with the idea of keeping the front page’s focus on personal blogging.  The thrilling thing in writing about sexuality is in exploring the parts of relationships that usually remain hidden.  Let’s not allow that to get lost in an endless parade of vibrating plastic.

I can understand that some people like reading posts on sexuality more than they like reading reviews (some, because I personally find many reviews far more entertaining than personal stories). But the presumption that, as a “community,” blogs should behave in a certain way, and bloggers should police their posts in a certain way, does not sit well with me.

I began this blog on the premise that I am not an erotica writer. I mentioned in my first post that I held off on getting a blog for a long time because I felt it was a “requirement” to write steamy stories. I do write sexy posts once in a while, when I have a particularly interesting sexual experience. But usually when it comes to sex, I don’t want to write about it — plus, I don’t think I’m very good at writing about it.

So what about posts on relationships and less sexual things (a.k.a. non-reviews)? If I have something to say, I’ll say it. I have some ideas for future posts, and I plan to articulate them at some point. But I believe I’m better at writing reviews, and I enjoy writing reviews more. And seriously, my life is not very exciting. I drink coffee; I go to school; I write papers; I sleep. The idea that I should post a certain number of non-review entries per review is ludicrous to me. This is my blog, and I refuse to apologize for its content or alter its content to fit some posited “community” standard. If I lose readers for having “too many reviews,” then those aren’t the appropriate readers for my blog.

What bothers me more than anything else, though, is the silent assumption that review writing, by its very nature, is less of an art form than non-review writing. One comment on Always Aroused Girl’s post was this:

. . . it drives me nuts when the first post on my page is a toy review. I will almost always post something else the same day or the next so that the review is not the first thing someone sees when they land.

This seems very weird to me. I want my latest review to be front and center. Maybe others don’t consider their reviews artistic endeavors, but I do. For me, writing reviews means taking into account so many things: flow, diction, humor, the balance between information and personal experience. I spend a lot of time writing my reviews — jotting down notes, formulating sentences, structuring paragraphs. I consider them wholly artistic. I try to present reviews that are interesting, well-written, and intelligent, reviews that go beyond the boring informational realm. When I write about a toy that has been reviewed quite a bit, I try to think of ways in which my review can present a new perspective.

I also often take photos to accompany my reviews. I spend quite a bit of time taking photos, choosing a photo, and editing it. I take pride in my photos, and I take even more pride in my reviews. It saddens me to think that others don’t recognize reviews for their artistic merit. The Best Sex Toy Reviewers list did, but then some bloggers chimed in and sort-of, well, ruined it for me.

On a more positive note, I do want to point out that, as a reviewer, I adhere to certain standards that Always Aroused Girl and others suggest. For instance, I don’t only write positive reviews. I love complaining about toys. Most of the companies I review for have made a point of mentioning that they value opinions, good or bad, and that their reviewers should feel free to express themselves. I do this not because I have been given the go ahead to do so, but because I feel a personal obligation to write the truth. I may not review a ton of bad products, but that’s because I know my way around sex toys now, and I know what I’ll hate.

This feeds into Always Aroused Girl’s plea that reviewers only review safe toys. I have agreed with this from the dawn of my sex toy reviewing career. Even when I knew very little about sex toys, I refused to accept any jelly toy for review. I will never review a toy that contains phthalates, a butt toy without a flared base, desensitizing agents, or anything else that is dangerous. (And, although it’s slightly off-topic, I have vowed to never review a porn film with the word “negro” in the title.)

Anyway, my point is this. I appreciate, most of the time, the generosity, empathy, and intellect of sex bloggers. What I don’t appreciate is feeling like I am a lesser blogger because I write a great deal of toy reviews. I do want to be a part of the sex blogger community, but I will not sacrifice or cut back on what I enjoy the most — writing reviews.


Share on Tumblr      

  • http://eros-logos.blogspot.com O

    Hi Epiphora,

    I haven’t commented on you before but I hope you’ll forgive me– I took a long hiatus from blogging and only recently started again, and only found your blog about a month ago.

    I think you might have misunderstood AAG’s post or responded to it on a very personal level….it seemed to me that AAG was specifically only talking about blogs that started out as personal sex blogs–blogs of the kind which you never had any intention to write, and never have–which then slowly morphed into “all review all the time” blogs. It’s undeniable that there are many such blogs in the sex blog community. It’s equally undeniable that many of these never give a bad review.

    I also believe that AAG meant only to discuss her personal preference for the more personal sex blogs, rather than the primarily review-focused ones. I didn’t read her as dictating ‘how to write a sex blog’ and I feel sure she would not do so–but rather as indicating her personal preference to read blogs that are personal. I think perhaps you are unfairly interpreting this as a general pronouncement about what ALL sex bloggers should do….but really, it’s not as if there’s any general consensus on what a sex blog IS. The best ‘sex blogs’ in my opinion are always about more than sex anyway, and all blogging and writing is a form of personal expression and it’s up to the individual blogger to do what she wants to do, and to hell with what anyone else thinks about it.

    Forgive this rambling comment. I mean to say that while I completely agree with what AAG wrote, it doesn’t change the fact that you are also a blog I read because I trust your reviews and I enjoy them–and frankly, I don’t feel that way about many reviewers. I read you for different reasons than I read the more personal blogs that are ‘sex blogs’, but the fact that you write a blog that eschews the personal doesn’t make you in any way lesser. i choose all kinds of blogs to read— and there are others that simply don’t interest me– all across the spectrum of blogs and topics, whether it’s politics, science, sex or gender.

    I think reviewing requires totally different skills than those personal bloggers have anyway. It’s not just that blogs that are about reviews are different to personal blogs, but also that each requires a wholly different skill set. So it’s no surprise that a blog which started out as a personal blog which then morphed into an ‘all review all the time’ blog might degenerate in quality. The skills required are entirely different, and so is the readership demographic, for that matter.

    Anyway, hope this helps. I don’t think you should feel constrained in what you write, or that AAG was trying to constrain you.

    very best wishes,
    O

  • Epiphora

    @O: Of course I responded to AAG’s post on a personal level. That is why I felt the need to write this entry — because the post struck a chord in me personally. I don’t believe I particularly “misinterpreted” what she wrote so much as I took issue with the use of “we” and “us” to describe what is essentially her own personal belief about reviewing and blogging. I consider myself a part of the sex blogging community, and thus felt the entry was indeed directed at me, even if my blog did not begin as a sex-centric blog.

    With that said, I agree with much of what you have said, and appreciate your thoughts on reviewing vs. blogging about personal issues.

    I would also like to state that this entry is meant to serve as a counterpoint/exploration of the thoughts bloggers have been expressing about sex toy reviewing. I felt my opinion differed from some of theirs, and thus wanted to post it. So it is not meant as a personal statement toward AAG — her quotes just laid it out the best.

  • http://aagblog.com aag

    My post was not about you.

    It was in fact just as dear O explained: About blogs which have with time turned away from personal account of sexuality and relationships (which I very much enjoy reading) to an overwhelming focus on reviews.

    If you prefer to write only reviews, then so be it. It is of course your blog and you can write whatever you want, from erotica to true stories to tales of monkeys playing at shuttlecock.

    :)

  • http://ofsexandlove.com Adriana

    I agree Epiphora. Completely. I saw this as, basically, an attack on any may see themselves as reviewers first, bloggers second. I haven’t been around the sexy corner of the blogosphere very long so maybe I have missed seeing some personal-turned-to-review-blogs that O speaks of but I think that the reason there are so many reviews these days is because a majority of blogs are for reviews, not sex in general. I don’t think that’s a crime. If you don’t want to read it, then don’t. I mean, I don’t like seeing people write about their kids on their sex blogs so I don’t read it. It’s really that easy. I didn’t feel the need to post about it or suggest that people cannot write how they see fit. So if we respond because this felt personal to us, well, I think there may be a reason for that.

  • carnivalesq

    Hello. I haven’t had a chance to read Always Aroused Girl’s post, but I have heard the buzz around it, and I also haven’t had a chance to read the comments on this post, but I’m commenting anyways regardless of being strapped for time.

    Thank you for writing this. I share your feelings on this topic. I need to read AAG’s post so that I know the full picture, but your reaction resonates with me. I too do not like the notion of some individuals talking about the so called need to police sex blogging. I also felt pretty “outside the group” when I heard the buzz begin. I’ll need to read the post later, when I get a chance.

  • http://outspokenclitic.com Toygirl

    Rock on, sistah! I’m linking to you.

    As for AAG’s post, I don’t believe you misinterpreted. A line near the beginning: “. . . can we possibly all agree that the number of reviews we are currently publishing is excessive? . .” That is not a sentence that kicks off a “my personal opinion” piece, and if she was talking about personal blogs turned review blogs, she never stated it. It also assumes some sort of community homogeneity, which I do not believe exists.

    She also made it seem like accepting toys for review was some sort of character flaw: “It’s nearly impossible to resist the lure of prettily wrapped packages which land weekly on our doorsteps, is it not?” (as if it was a foregone conclusion that they ought to be resisted). If she was only discussing her preference for her blog and we’re upset over nothing, the fault is with her for poor wording. But I don’t think she was, and I think this post is completely justified. No one should have the hubris to tell others what’s appropriate on their own blogs.

  • http://sxychikadee.blogspot.com sxychikadee

    I think you, Adriana, Beautiful Dreamer, Toy Girl, etc. all have a very important place in the sex blogger community because you are writing about sex toys. Your writings are all creative, insightful, informative and useful. The good toy reviewers are, in my opinion, what brings more people into the blogging world – which I happen to think it a good thing.

    I agree with Adriana in that I don’t want to read about kids on sex blogs. When I think of “sex blog” I think of a blog about sex: experiences with it, feelings about it, society issues with it, and of course sexual aides. I love reading sensual stories and experiences, but I also love reading about sex toys. I moved into the blogging world from an onsite company because I had read all of the toy reviews and I wanted to read more. So now I have a blog roll that is about half reviewers and half either non-reviewers or few reviews.

    Since all of this started earlier this week, I have been looking at some other reviewer blogs that I don’t normally read. I didn’t blog roll them because their reviews were all fluff n stuff about how fabulous XYZ company is and some of them didn’t even mention safe toy practices (cleaning, care, and material concerns.) Sadly, some of them were on that “Best” list – in fact that’s how I found some of them. (Others I found through links.) I suppose when I reread some of the posts like the one you mention that those are the people to whom such writing was addressed, but I certainly don’t know that & I would have felt slighted if I were you as well.

    Rambling halting.

    Point: I appreciate the work you put into your reviews, both here and onsite other places.

  • http://www.scarlets-letter.net amber

    I love sex toy reviews. I don’t write erotica or share many personal entries on my blog, I enjoy using it mostly for reviews, contests, and showcasing cool items. So I don’t mind if I don’t fit into the “ideal” sex blogger guidelines. I DO love your blog, and I would not change a thing. Your reviews are always beautifully written and I find inspiration on your website a lot. Rock on sister, I love your style. The way I see it is – erotica, reviews, whatever, if it’s something you feel passionate about, do it, do it and don’t stop :)

    Sending you much admiration and support,
    Amber

  • http://beautifuldreamer30.blogspot.com Beautiful Dreamer

    You write lovely reviews, they are honest, funny, encouraging, and so personal that the reader almost feels as if they’re sitting there getting sex toy 101 from the lovely Epiphora.
    I personally prefer sex toy reviews. I understand that some people prefer stories, sex, etc.: but aren’t toys encompassing that as well? They are an integral part to my sex life and I am so happy that I’ve been given opportunities to try and share the product and share the knowledge I’ve gained.
    With that said, as long as your reviewing, I’ll be reading. :)

  • http://www.ThatToyChick.com ThatToyChick

    It started as a comment, but got so long I made it a blog, haha! You can read my take on things at ttp://tinyurl.com/aebcdo

    -TTC

  • http://ofsexandlove.com Adriana

    @aag: Then I must say, you really used the wrong words.

  • http://geometricbubbles.blogspot.com Sienna

    GREAT post! I know I write a combination of reviews and erotica, but I’m equally proud of whatever goes up on my blog. Congratulations on making the top 5 pleasurists list!!!

  • http://www.sleepingdreamer.com Sleeping Dreamer

    I’ve sacrificed a lot of content to write reviews. I’ve been writing an increase of reviews lately and you know what I noticed? I’m generating a lot more traffic to my blog. Whereas before it was only relationship content and 0 reviews, I rarely got hits on my blog, people didn’t know who I was or that I existed. Now that I’m writing a heavy stream of reviews I have people on my website every day- whats happening is that they’re reading my relationship content and erotica as well as my reviews now. I don’t care if first and foremost I’m a reviewer if it means the type of exposure to where people come for the reviews but stay to read my posts that aren’t about adult themed products.

  • Backseat Boohoo

    I actually really love toy reviews, photos (like photos of a toy or HNT pictures), and personal essays. Erotica really doesn’t do it for me. I’ll read it from time to time, but if I see one of my favorite bloggers posted an erotic story, I’m much less interested than if they had posted, say, a review on a new toy.

    It all boils down to personal opinion. And as sex is multi-faceted, I feel like sex blogs should also be wide and varied–not just stuff about sexual acts, but stuff about sex toys, health resources, etcetera.

  • http://girlfrisky.com girlfrisky

    all i know is that if i need to read a review of a sex toy, epiphora is where i will start looking. some sites are for erotica, some for blatant recounts of events and/or musings [like mine] and some are for reviews. I like knowing that one site does one thing and does it well. that keeps me coming back.

  • http://eros-logos.blogspot.com O

    Naturally you responded on a personal level…I didn’t put that well. I was suggesting you took it personally when it wasn’t directed at you or blogs like yours.

    That’s how I read AAG, and that’s what she confirmed in her comment.

    Insofar as the use of the terms ‘we’, ‘us’ and ‘community’ is involved, I only read AAG as saying that the community ought to endorse certain standards about safety and have standards about the companies worked with and so on–in fact, they’re all standards that you yourself acknowledge that you’ve endorsed from the beginning. That’s the only sense in which I think anyone wants to ‘police’ sex toys reviews, and I think we (yes i said we) can all agree on that, and already do.

    thanks for this post; I always appreciate a good debate. In re: the blogosphere, let a hundred flowers of opinion bloom–it’s what it exists for.

    cheers,
    O

  • http://alpinesubdreams.com/alpine/ Alpine Subdreams

    Hi Epiphora,

    Thanks for this post. I agree with many of you and saw that AAG post was more of an attack. I do agree with some of her points but I believed there should of been other ways to say it.

    I’ll keep this short and sweet, I love your site and your reviews. Your doing a great job and will always have a place in my feeder.

  • http://ofsexandlove.com Adriana

    I wonder, then, if so many of us apparently read this the “wrong” way, does that not indicate something?

  • http://www.sleepingdreamer.com/2009/02/are-reviewers-sacrificing-integrity.html Sleeping Dreamer

    You’ve inspired me Epiphora… as well as AAG’s response to my post… I had to write up a post because well, I’m a reviewer. :)

    http://www.sleepingdreamer.com/2009/02/are-reviewers-sacrificing-integrity.html

  • DominaDoll

    Thanks Epiphora for taking a stand on this and being so brave. I admire you and your writing rocks! I’ll have more to say about this tomorrow as I am recovering from my trip to Montreal. I was very saddened to come back and find @aag’s post and what i felt was a lot of negativity directed at sex toy reviewers because of a list that myself and @scarletlotus created. Anyway… More tomorrow when I have my head on straight, but thank you for not apologizing for being a great reviewer and doing what you do best! :) ~HUGS!

  • http://champagneandbenzedrine.blogspot.com/ Champagne and Benzedrine

    I have to admit, I agree with AAG’s comments – there are FAR too many reviews being posted on many sex blogs and I, like many people (presumably AAG) will often skip past a blog that has a review as the initial landing post (I might try again in a day or so, but if I see another review, I’ll probably give up.)

    But you put it best here:

    “If I lose readers for having “too many reviews,” then those aren’t the appropriate readers for my blog.”

    That’s absolutely fair enough. YOU write your blog for YOUR reasons and you have the freedom to post whatever the hell you want.

    but I don’t think AAG or others were trying to ‘police’ people’s blogs. I think she’s just giving legitimate constructive criticism that all these reviews somehow dilute the point of posts about sexuality and sexuality-related blogs.

    It’s not that they’re not as legitimate as ‘real’ blog posts (I should know, I write reviews for a living.) But people interested in sex and sexuality are presumably getting frustrated about seeing so many of them. AAG was merely expressing that frustration.

  • DominaDoll

    Back again. You’ve also inspired me Epiphora. Here’s my post and thoughts on the subject:
    http://lucreziamagazine.com/popmycherry/2009/02/sex-toy-reviewers-controversy/ Please come read and support me! Thanks! Comments most welcome :)

  • Rose

    @Epiphora: Epiphora, the REASON I come to your blog is because I know that I will find great, well written reviews that make me laugh and make me want to try out a product and see my own results. I prefer your website over many others (though I still read the others) *because* it gives me reviews of the toys I’m hungry to learn about. Having not owned any sex toys myself, I love to know what sex-toys are considered good (by many reviewers) and which are considered “bad”…so why not inform myself of such things?

    I tend to get bored when review-sites only talk about their personal life…I want the reviews, baby! The down-and-dirty details like, who gushed when and what felt best, and why they liked this toy…rather than when Jimmy went to get the mail on Saturday…

    But those who write about their personal lives, it’s their choice – and I say, if you can exercise writing even more, write away!! Sometimes, it is interesting to see a little personal background of a reviewer, so I know how they function throughout daily life, as well as get their sexual needs taken care of.

    But I do believe that you are right to have mostly reviews on your website…considering that this, after all, *is* a SEX TOY REVIEW site. :)

  • rocketlindy

    I know I care a lot more about reviews than I do about other people’s sex lives. I like your blog precisely because it’s mostly reviews.

    If I go to a “review” kinda blog and have to go back a page or two to find an actual review, I’ll probably not be back.